© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The Uber logo is seen on the trading floor at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in Manhattan, New York City, U.S., August 2, 2022. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) – Tech giant Uber (NYSE:) and delivery apps DiDi and Rappi have proposed offering social security benefits to workers in Mexico for the first time ahead of a new government bill set to regulate the gig economy.
The companies said in a statement on Wednesday, co-signed by worker-rights activist groups, they were open to covering drivers and couriers who work an average of more than 40 hours a week on one or more platforms.
They stopped short of agreeing to classify drivers as employees, however, and few details were given on how payments towards social security costs would be divided.
Mexican Labor Minister Luisa Alcalde has said officials are working on a bill, which she hopes to present before the end of the year, that would bring gig workers into the “formal economy.”
It is still unclear if the bill will seek to make drivers employees, or propose other reforms in line with the apps’ statement.
Ridesharing and delivery apps worldwide have pushed back against calls to classify workers as employees rather than independent contractors, saying the change would hinder their business models and deny drivers flexibility.
The statement from Uber, Chinese mobility firm DiDi Global Inc and Latin American delivery app Rappi also suggested establishing mechanisms to ensure fair pay in line with time worked, but did not outline specifics.
“It’s time to take the next step and find a point of consensus … and start improving conditions,” Tonatiuh Anzures, Didi’s government affairs director in Mexico, said in an interview.
Any changes will depend on further talks and government backing, Anzures added.
Nicolas Sanchez, Uber’s head of public policy in Mexico, said that he hoped that extra costs would be low but Uber was “open to them” if the industry, which encompasses some 500,000 people, was allowed to retain flexibility.
The Labor Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.